Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.126(b), 296(b), 115( vs Sundarraj and 2 others — 60/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(b), 296(b),115(2),351(3),118(2). Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR060000142026

Issue of Service

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

e-Filing Number

31-12-2025

Filing Number

15/2026

Filing Date

03-01-2026

Registration No

60/2026

Registration Date

12-01-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur

Judge

1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(b), 296(b),115(2),351(3),118(2)
Tn Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

Sattur Town Police Station, U/s.126(b), 296(b), 115(

, 351(

,118(

BNS and 4 of TNPHW Act

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sundarraj and 2 others

Maheswari

Muthuraj alias Muthuraj

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judicial Magistrate No. II

07-03-2026

Issue of Service

06-03-2026

Orders

12-01-2026

Issue of Service

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

Summary This is a Statement of De Facto Complainant (affidavit) filed on 6 March 2026 before Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Sattur, in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 84 of 2026. The complainant (age 50) deposed that she was obstructed, verbally abused, assaulted, and threatened by the accused persons (Sundhar and others), and requested the court to pursue the case for these offenses despite police removing certain charges. No final order on bail, petition dismissal, or adjournment is recorded in this document—it is only the sworn statement of the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a Statement of De Facto Complainant (affidavit) filed on 6 March 2026 before Judicial Magistrate No. 2, Sattur, in Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 84 of 2026. The complainant (age 50) deposed that she was obstructed, verbally abused, assaulted, and threatened by the accused persons (Sundhar and others), and requested the court to pursue the case for these offenses despite police removing certain charges. No final order on bail, petition dismissal, or adjournment is recorded in this document—it is only the sworn statement of the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate No. II Court, Sattur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case