Inspector of Police, North P.S. vs Sanjay and 13 others — 218/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,148,294(b),307,323,332,147,506(ii). Status: Issue of Service. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNVR020113952023
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
11191/2023
Filing Date
14-09-2023
Registration No
218/2023
Registration Date
14-09-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector of Police, North P.S.
Adv. Public Prosecutor
Respondent(s)
Sanjay and 13 others
Kaliraj
Kadarkarai
Ramkumar
Muthupandi
Shanmugavel
Raja
Boomiraja
Gnanasekar
Murugan
Sanjeevi Raj
Muthupandi
Eswaran
Petchimuthu
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 20-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-02-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 30-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 30-12-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of witness Sivaraman (P.W.9) in case SC.218/2023 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar District on February 20, 2026. The witness testified about a stone-throwing incident on September 24, 2022, near NTR supermarket that resulted in injuries to two police officers, though he claimed fear of the accused prevented him from initially providing full details. The witness's deposition was recorded in open court, read over in the presence of the accused, and admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of witness Sivaraman (P.W.9) in case SC.218/2023 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Virudhunagar District on February 20, 2026. The witness testified about a stone-throwing incident on September 24, 2022, near NTR supermarket that resulted in injuries to two police officers, though he claimed fear of the accused prevented him from initially providing full details. The witness's deposition was recorded in open court, read over in the presence of the accused, and admitted by the witness as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts