kannan vs Inayatullah Advocate - CHELLAPANDIAN A — 208/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 25-Mar-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNVR020070562025

e-Filing Number

08-12-2025

Filing Number

6814/2025

Filing Date

09-Dec-2025

Registration No

208/2026

Registration Date

21-Jan-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.kannan

    Adv. Vadivel A

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Inayatullah Advocate - CHELLAPANDIAN A

Case History

  1. 25-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  7. 21-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    This is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) document recorded on 21.01.2026 in a Fast Track Magistrate Court case (STC No. 208/2026) in Srivilliputtur. The complainant (Kannan) provided pre-summons evidence along with supporting documents including bank receipts for ₹4,00,000, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments, requesting investigation and punishment of the accused with compensation. This is a procedural record of witness examination, not a final court order granting or denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 21-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

This is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) document recorded on 21.01.2026 in a Fast Track Magistrate Court case (STC No. 208/2026) in Srivilliputtur. The complainant (Kannan) provided pre-summons evidence along with supporting documents including bank receipts for ₹4,00,000, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments, requesting investigation and punishment of the accused with compensation. This is a procedural record of witness examination, not a final court order granting or denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case