Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited vs Muthupandi — 1647/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR020063872025
e-Filing Number
14-11-2025
Filing Number
6171/2025
Filing Date
18-Nov-2025
Registration No
1647/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Equitas Small Finance Bank Limited
Adv. BARATHKUMAR K M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muthupandi
-
2.Chellathai
-
3.Muthulakshmi Gudalingam
-
4.G. Mahalingam
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2026
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Dec-2025
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
Summary: The petition filed by Equitas Small Finance Bank under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 has been allowed. The court granted the bank's request to take physical possession of the mortgaged property after the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 5,01,000 business loan and failed to respond to demand and possession notices. An Advocate Commissioner has been appointed to inspect the property, take inventory, and hand over possession to the bank, with police assistance authorized to execute the warrant if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Dec-2025
Await Reports
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
16-Dec-2025
Orders
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1647/2025
Summary: The petition filed by Equitas Small Finance Bank under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 has been allowed. The court granted the bank's request to take physical possession of the mortgaged property after the respondents defaulted on a Rs. 5,01,000 business loan and failed to respond to demand and possession notices. An Advocate Commissioner has been appointed to inspect the property, take inventory, and hand over possession to the bank, with police assistance authorized to execute the warrant if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts