State Rep By Assistant Director Of Industrial Safety And Health III Sivakasi vs M MAREESWARAN — 1131/2024

Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 1.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(w) S41R61F S85(i) 2.S88(1)R96(1)(2) S85(i) 3.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(q) S85(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR020052322024

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

07-11-2024

Filing Number

4834/2024

Filing Date

25-12-2024

Registration No

1131/2024

Registration Date

31-12-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Factories Act, 1948 Section 1.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(w) S41R61F S85(i) 2.S88(1)R96(1)(2) S85(i) 3.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(q) S85(i)

Petitioner(s)

State Rep By Assistant Director Of Industrial Safety And Health III Sivakasi

Adv. deputy director2 ish sivakasi

Respondent(s)

M MAREESWARAN

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

06-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

06-02-2026

Evidence

23-01-2026

Evidence

09-01-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-02-2026
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. The witness (P.W.3) testified on February 20, 2026, regarding a fire accident at S.R.M. Firecrackers factory in Sivakasi on August 7, 2024, that caused burn injuries to a worker. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This is procedural testimony documentation, not a ruling on bail, dismissal, or adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. The witness (P.W.3) testified on February 20, 2026, regarding a fire accident at S.R.M. Firecrackers factory in Sivakasi on August 7, 2024, that caused burn injuries to a worker. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This is procedural testimony documentation, not a ruling on bail, dismissal, or adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case