State Rep By Assistant Director Of Industrial Safety And Health III Sivakasi vs M MAREESWARAN — 1131/2024

Case under Factories Act, 1948 Section 1.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(w) S41R61F S85(i) 2.S88(1)R96(1)(2) S85(i) 3.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(q) S85(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVR020052322024

e-Filing Number

07-11-2024

Filing Number

4834/2024

Filing Date

25-Dec-2024

Registration No

1131/2024

Registration Date

31-Dec-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Factories Act, 1948 Section 1.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(w) S41R61F S85(i) 2.S88(1)R96(1)(2) S85(i) 3.S87R95SCH XXIV Art10(q) S85(i)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Rep By Assistant Director Of Industrial Safety And Health III Sivakasi

    Adv. deputy director2 ish sivakasi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M MAREESWARAN

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. The witness (P.W.3) testified on February 20, 2026, regarding a fire accident at S.R.M. Firecrackers factory in Sivakasi on August 7, 2024, that caused burn injuries to a worker. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This is procedural testimony documentation, not a ruling on bail, dismissal, or adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 28-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 14-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  12. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 27-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 08-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 09-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 28-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 07-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 23-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  26. 22-Apr-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  27. 22-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 11-Mar-2025

    Issue of Process

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 28-Feb-2025

    Issue of Process

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 29-Jan-2025

    Issue of Process

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 31-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 25-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1131/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a witness deposition, not a court order with a final judgment. The witness (P.W.3) testified on February 20, 2026, regarding a fire accident at S.R.M. Firecrackers factory in Sivakasi on August 7, 2024, that caused burn injuries to a worker. The deposition was recorded in open court, read over to the witness in presence of the accused, and admitted as correct. This is procedural testimony documentation, not a ruling on bail, dismissal, or adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case