ANAND vs SUDHARSHAN Advocate - Rahul N — 1486/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Counter. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR020051692025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
30-08-2025
Filing Number
5009/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
1486/2025
Registration Date
10-10-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANAND
Adv. Arun Nehru M
Respondent(s)
SUDHARSHAN Advocate - Rahul N
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Counter
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Counter |
| 12-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Judicial Fast Track Magistrate, Srivilliputtur (Case STC.No. 1486/2025). The witness provided pre-summons evidence on 10.10.2025, detailing various bank documents and communications related to the case, including transactions from Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank (₹4,00,000), Ujjivan Small Finance Bank, and HDFC Bank. The court ordered production of additional bank account documents and comparative analysis, and the witness prayed for compensation against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) recorded under Chapter XXIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Judicial Fast Track Magistrate, Srivilliputtur (Case STC.No. 1486/2025). The witness provided pre-summons evidence on 10.10.2025, detailing various bank documents and communications related to the case, including transactions from Tamil Nadu Mercantile Bank (₹4,00,000), Ujjivan Small Finance Bank, and HDFC Bank. The court ordered production of additional bank account documents and comparative analysis, and the witness prayed for compensation against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts