Sivakumar vs Rajendran — 1380/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Contested--Conviction on 09th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR020051442024
e-Filing Number
16-12-2024
Filing Number
4750/2024
Filing Date
19-12-2024
Registration No
1380/2024
Registration Date
19-12-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Conviction
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sivakumar
Adv. Duraisaravanan S
Respondent(s)
Rajendran
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 24-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court in Srivilliputtur convicted K. Rajendran under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 2,00,000 for 100 bags of paddy purchased on October 10, 2024, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court rejected the accused's defense that he purchased the paddy from Manoharan instead, finding it implausible and lacking corroborating evidence. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 2,00,000 as compensation to the complainant within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court in Srivilliputtur convicted K. Rajendran under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 2,00,000 for 100 bags of paddy purchased on October 10, 2024, which was dishonored due to insufficient funds. The court rejected the accused's defense that he purchased the paddy from Manoharan instead, finding it implausible and lacking corroborating evidence. The accused was sentenced to one year simple imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs. 2,00,000 as compensation to the complainant within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts