State Bank of India vs Sri Vetrivel Traders — 1949/2024

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR020051122024

Await Reports

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

05-12-2024

Filing Number

4720/2024

Filing Date

18-12-2024

Registration No

1949/2024

Registration Date

19-12-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section Section 14

Petitioner(s)

State Bank of India

Adv. Pethu Rajesh

Respondent(s)

Sri Vetrivel Traders

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

06-03-2026

Await Reports

20-02-2026

Await Reports

06-02-2026

Await Reports

23-01-2026

Await Reports

03-01-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

03-03-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

PETITION ALLOWED The Chief Judicial Magistrate court at Srivilliputhur allowed State Bank of India's petition under the SARFAESI Act seeking court assistance to take physical possession of four mortgaged properties. The court found that the borrower and guarantors defaulted on a Rs.4.98 crore loan facility (outstanding dues Rs.3.87 crore as of May 2024), and that the bank had properly complied with all statutory procedures including demand notice and possession notice. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed to take inventory, secure physical possession of the properties, and hand them over to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

PETITION ALLOWED The Chief Judicial Magistrate court at Srivilliputhur allowed State Bank of India's petition under the SARFAESI Act seeking court assistance to take physical possession of four mortgaged properties. The court found that the borrower and guarantors defaulted on a Rs.4.98 crore loan facility (outstanding dues Rs.3.87 crore as of May 2024), and that the bank had properly complied with all statutory procedures including demand notice and possession notice. An Advocate Commissioner was appointed to take inventory, secure physical possession of the properties, and hand them over to the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case