Canara Bank Rep by Authorized Officer C Siva vs TVS Masala Company — 1254/2025
Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14(1) and (2). Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR020048932025
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
e-Filing Number
23-08-2025
Filing Number
4741/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2025
Registration No
1254/2025
Registration Date
15-09-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank Rep by Authorized Officer C Siva
Adv. Sundaraj M
Respondent(s)
TVS Masala Company
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
Await Reports
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Await Reports |
| 20-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 06-02-2026 | Await Reports |
| 23-01-2026 | Await Reports |
| 09-01-2026 | Await Reports |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition filed by Canara Bank under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 has been allowed. The court granted the bank assistance to take physical possession of the mortgaged property (9.83 cents of land in Anaikuttam Village, Sivakasi) belonging to the respondent borrower, who defaulted on a loan of Rs. 47,50,000/-. An Advocate Commissioner has been appointed to inspect the property, take inventory, and hand over possession to the bank after following due procedure and notification to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition filed by Canara Bank under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 has been allowed. The court granted the bank assistance to take physical possession of the mortgaged property (9.83 cents of land in Anaikuttam Village, Sivakasi) belonging to the respondent borrower, who defaulted on a loan of Rs. 47,50,000/-. An Advocate Commissioner has been appointed to inspect the property, take inventory, and hand over possession to the bank after following due procedure and notification to both parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts