A Tamilraj vs K Ayyanar — 1864/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR020047662024
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-11-2024
Filing Number
4385/2024
Filing Date
22-11-2024
Registration No
1864/2024
Registration Date
22-11-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A Tamilraj
Adv. Selvakumar R
Respondent(s)
K Ayyanar
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate II
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 25-02-2026 | Orders |
| 19-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 20-01-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-12-2025 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Cr.M.P.No.1864/2024, Tamil Nadu High Court, dated 20.12.2024 Outcome: This is a criminal petition where the petitioner (a lawyer and land owner) filed a complaint alleging that electricity department officials and revenue officials damaged trees on his property on 25.07.2024 without permission. The petitioner complained that subsequent FIR CSR.542/2024 was improperly closed as "compromise effected" without proper investigation or recording his statement. The petitioner seeks action against the officials under IPC Section 199,248 for alleged misconduct and seeks relief from the High Court. The document shows the petitioner's detailed affidavit detailing the procedural irregularities and requesting appropriate legal action against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Cr.M.P.No.1864/2024, Tamil Nadu High Court, dated 20.12.2024 Outcome: This is a criminal petition where the petitioner (a lawyer and land owner) filed a complaint alleging that electricity department officials and revenue officials damaged trees on his property on 25.07.2024 without permission. The petitioner complained that subsequent FIR CSR.542/2024 was improperly closed as "compromise effected" without proper investigation or recording his statement. The petitioner seeks action against the officials under IPC Section 199,248 for alleged misconduct and seeks relief from the High Court. The document shows the petitioner's detailed affidavit detailing the procedural irregularities and requesting appropriate legal action against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts