Dhandayuthabani K vs Mahalakshmi S — 1121/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 r/w 142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNVR020046892025

Evidence

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

e-Filing Number

07-08-2025

Filing Number

4548/2025

Filing Date

13-08-2025

Registration No

1121/2025

Registration Date

13-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 r/w 142
Mp/1/2025 Classification : Attachment or Furnish Security Petition Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/2/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/3/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 311 Cr.pc Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Dhandayuthabani K
Mp/8/2026 Classification : Recall Petition Section Dhandayuthabani K

Petitioner(s)

Dhandayuthabani K

Adv. Vijayan B

Respondent(s)

Mahalakshmi S

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

17-03-2026

Evidence

12-03-2026

Counter

06-03-2026

Arguments

26-02-2026

Arguments

18-02-2026

Arguments

Interim Orders

17-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The Fast Track Court at Srivilliputtur allowed the petition filed by accused Mahalakshmi under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to re-open the case for defence evidence. The court found that despite the accused's failure to present defence evidence earlier, she is entitled to present her case in the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 charge, and procedural defects in pleading do not bar relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Fast Track Court at Srivilliputtur allowed the petition filed by accused Mahalakshmi under Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to re-open the case for defence evidence. The court found that despite the accused's failure to present defence evidence earlier, she is entitled to present her case in the Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 charge, and procedural defects in pleading do not bar relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case