M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited vs MookkandiPonraj — 1251/2025

Case under Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14. Status: Await Reports. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR020046622025

Await Reports

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

e-Filing Number

19-05-2025

Filing Number

4521/2025

Filing Date

12-08-2025

Registration No

1251/2025

Registration Date

12-09-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Securitisationandreconstructionoffinancialassets&enforcementofsecurityinterestact Section 14

Petitioner(s)

M/s. Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Limited

Adv. SIVARAJA PANDIYAN K

Respondent(s)

MookkandiPonraj

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Chief Judicial Magistrate

06-03-2026

Await Reports

20-02-2026

Await Reports

06-02-2026

Await Reports

23-01-2026

Await Reports

09-01-2026

Await Reports

Interim Orders

10-11-2025
Copy of Judgment/Order

Summary: The petition filed by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Limited under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 has been allowed. The court directed the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the mortgaged property (valued at Rs. 26,40,000) after the respondents defaulted on their loan repayment obligations. The court found that the bank had properly complied with all statutory requirements including issuance of demand and possession notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Company Limited under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act 2002 has been allowed. The court directed the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to take physical possession of the mortgaged property (valued at Rs. 26,40,000) after the respondents defaulted on their loan repayment obligations. The court found that the bank had properly complied with all statutory requirements including issuance of demand and possession notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case