A Tamilraj vs E.Paul Esuthasan — 660/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 190(1)(a) and 200crpc. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR020022042024
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
16-04-2024
Filing Number
2032/2024
Filing Date
17-04-2024
Registration No
660/2024
Registration Date
17-04-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
6-Judicial Magistrate II
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A Tamilraj
Adv. Selvakumar R
Respondent(s)
E.Paul Esuthasan
Karuthapandi
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Judicial Magistrate II
Orders
Orders
Orders
Enquiry
Enquiry
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Orders |
| 13-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 25-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 05-02-2026 | Enquiry |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Crl.M.P. No. 660/2024, dated 06-05-2024 Outcome: The court's order addresses a criminal petition filed by the petitioner (Tamilraj) against investigating officers for alleged misconduct and delay in filing the final chargesheet. The petitioner alleges that despite a prior court order (Crl.M.P. No. 1642/2021) directing inclusion of an 11th accused and completion of investigation, the investigating officers deliberately delayed filing the supplementary chargesheet. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding procedural lapses and sought action under IPC Section 166A against the responsible officers for non-compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Crl.M.P. No. 660/2024, dated 06-05-2024 Outcome: The court's order addresses a criminal petition filed by the petitioner (Tamilraj) against investigating officers for alleged misconduct and delay in filing the final chargesheet. The petitioner alleges that despite a prior court order (Crl.M.P. No. 1642/2021) directing inclusion of an 11th accused and completion of investigation, the investigating officers deliberately delayed filing the supplementary chargesheet. The court found merit in the petitioner's contentions regarding procedural lapses and sought action under IPC Section 166A against the responsible officers for non-compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts