A MARIYADAYANA vs E AMALORPAVAM THERESE RANI Advocate - R Thiruppathi — 798/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Counter. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR020010882025
Next Hearing
24th March 2026
e-Filing Number
08-03-2025
Filing Number
1033/2025
Filing Date
01-04-2025
Registration No
798/2025
Registration Date
04-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
A MARIYADAYANA
Adv. Viswanathan M
Respondent(s)
E AMALORPAVAM THERESE RANI Advocate - R Thiruppathi
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Counter
Evidence
Enquiry
Enquiry
Counter
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Counter |
| 11-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 26-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 17-02-2026 | Counter |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Srivilliputtur dismissed a petition filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking to send documents for handwriting expert opinion. The petitioner/accused alleged signature forgery in the complaint and deposition, but the court found the signature differences were visible to the naked eye, making expert examination unnecessary. The petition was dismissed without cost as the court determined the petitioner was not entitled to the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Srivilliputtur dismissed a petition filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking to send documents for handwriting expert opinion. The petitioner/accused alleged signature forgery in the complaint and deposition, but the court found the signature differences were visible to the naked eye, making expert examination unnecessary. The petition was dismissed without cost as the court determined the petitioner was not entitled to the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts