A MARIYADAYANA vs E AMALORPAVAM THERESE RANI Advocate - R Thiruppathi — 798/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Counter. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNVR020010882025
e-Filing Number
08-03-2025
Filing Number
1033/2025
Filing Date
01-Apr-2025
Registration No
798/2025
Registration Date
04-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A MARIYADAYANA
Adv. Viswanathan M
Respondent(s)
-
1.E AMALORPAVAM THERESE RANI Advocate - R Thiruppathi
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
SUMMARY: The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Srivilliputtur dismissed a petition filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking to send documents for handwriting expert opinion. The petitioner/accused alleged signature forgery in the complaint and deposition, but the court found the signature differences were visible to the naked eye, making expert examination unnecessary. The petition was dismissed without cost as the court determined the petitioner was not entitled to the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
06-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
26-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
17-Feb-2026
Counter
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
06-Feb-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
02-Feb-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
22-Jan-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
18-Dec-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
02-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
17-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
29-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
25-Oct-2025
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
08-Sep-2025
Service Pending-Warrant
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
04-Aug-2025
Service Pending-Summon
Judicial Magistrate(FTC)
-
04-Jul-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
04-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 798/2025
SUMMARY: The Judicial Magistrate Fast Track Court, Srivilliputtur dismissed a petition filed under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking to send documents for handwriting expert opinion. The petitioner/accused alleged signature forgery in the complaint and deposition, but the court found the signature differences were visible to the naked eye, making expert examination unnecessary. The petition was dismissed without cost as the court determined the petitioner was not entitled to the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts