Labour office vs Kanagarajan 311 MC — 206/2026

Case under Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act,1986 Section 9(2) 11 16(1). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR020008532026

Filing Number

794/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

206/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

6-Judicial Magistrate II

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act,1986 Section 9(2) 11 16(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Labour office

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kanagarajan 311 MC

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment/OrderView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate Court II at Tiruppattur permitted cross-examination of witnesses (PW1-PW3) under CrPC Section 311, rejecting the accused's argument that cross-examination was unnecessary since initial examination had already occurred. The court held that cross-examination is essential for both parties to establish their case and test witness credibility, and ordered the accused to pay ₹500 each to witnesses PW2 and PW3 (total ₹1,000) for their appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate II

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate II

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate Court II at Tiruppattur permitted cross-examination of witnesses (PW1-PW3) under CrPC Section 311, rejecting the accused's argument that cross-examination was unnecessary since initial examination had already occurred. The court held that cross-examination is essential for both parties to establish their case and test witness credibility, and ordered the accused to pay ₹500 each to witnesses PW2 and PW3 (total ₹1,000) for their appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case