Dinesh Kumar vs Thangam — 16/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

Orders Next hearing 23-Mar-2026 this date has passed

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNVR020001872025

e-Filing Number

23-01-2025

Filing Number

168/2025

Filing Date

29-Jan-2025

Registration No

16/2025

Registration Date

29-Jan-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dinesh Kumar

    Adv. MUTHUKUMAR M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thangam

Case History

  1. 23-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: This STC No. 16-2025 order dated 12.02.2026 pertains to a criminal petition regarding charges under various IPC sections. The court examined the petitioner's arguments regarding insufficient evidence and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found merit in certain contentions but dismissed the petition, directing that the case proceed to trial while noting specific evidentiary deficiencies that require further examination during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  11. 19-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  13. 08-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  15. 19-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  16. 10-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  17. 04-Dec-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  19. 26-Nov-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  20. 19-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  21. 10-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  22. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  23. 27-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  24. 16-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  25. 07-Oct-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  26. 18-Sep-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  27. 18-Sep-2025

    Part Heard

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  28. 10-Sep-2025

    Counter

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  29. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  30. 11-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  31. 07-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  32. 24-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  33. 03-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  34. 03-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  35. 19-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  36. 09-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  37. 26-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  38. 14-May-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  39. 05-May-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  40. 25-Mar-2025

    Service Pending-Summon

    Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

  41. 29-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 29-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 16/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: This STC No. 16-2025 order dated 12.02.2026 pertains to a criminal petition regarding charges under various IPC sections. The court examined the petitioner's arguments regarding insufficient evidence and procedural irregularities in the investigation. The court found merit in certain contentions but dismissed the petition, directing that the case proceed to trial while noting specific evidentiary deficiencies that require further examination during the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case