NARAYANASAMY vs VETRI MURUGAN — 224/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 AND 142. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNVR020000672026

Questioning

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

e-Filing Number

29-12-2025

Filing Number

66/2026

Filing Date

05-01-2026

Registration No

224/2026

Registration Date

23-01-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 AND 142
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section NARAYANASAMY
Mp/2/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section NARAYANASAMY
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section VETRI MURUGANNARAYANASAMY

Petitioner(s)

NARAYANASAMY

Adv. Selvam M

Respondent(s)

VETRI MURUGAN

Hearing History

Judge: 7-Judicial Magistrate(FTC)

16-03-2026

Questioning

06-03-2026

Questioning

26-02-2026

Questioning

23-01-2026

Service Pending-Summon

Interim Orders

23-01-2026
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

This document is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) recorded before the Judicial Fast Track Magistrate, Srivilliputtur, in case STC.No. 224/2026, dated 23.01.2026. The witness (complainant Narayanaswami) deposited pre-summons evidence and produced supporting documents including bank receipts for ₹2,50,000, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments, seeking punishment of the accused and compensation. The deposition was transcribed, read back to the witness, and confirmed as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document is a deposition of witness (P.W. 1) recorded before the Judicial Fast Track Magistrate, Srivilliputtur, in case STC.No. 224/2026, dated 23.01.2026. The witness (complainant Narayanaswami) deposited pre-summons evidence and produced supporting documents including bank receipts for ₹2,50,000, legal notices, and postal acknowledgments, seeking punishment of the accused and compensation. The deposition was transcribed, read back to the witness, and confirmed as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case