Inspector of Police, Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar vs Raju, Contractor Worker, N.H.M. Project Account Assistant, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District — 4/2025

Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7. Disposed: Uncontested--CLOSED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - Referred Charge Sheet

CNR: TNVR010064112025

e-Filing Number

03-12-2025

Filing Number

4935/2025

Filing Date

10-Dec-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

10-Dec-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CLOSED

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Inspector of Police, Vigilance And Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar

    Adv. Additional Superintendent of Police Virudhunagar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju, Contractor Worker, N.H.M. Project Account Assistant, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    The witness (complainant) deposited that he filed a case against a contract employee for demanding a ₹3,000 bribe to process vehicle rental reimbursement under the R.P.S.K scheme; subsequently, the accused was dismissed from service on 22.09.2025 based on a corruption report sent to the Anti-Corruption Bureau, following which the witness expressed no objection to closing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 10-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 10-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The witness (complainant) deposited that he filed a case against a contract employee for demanding a ₹3,000 bribe to process vehicle rental reimbursement under the R.P.S.K scheme; subsequently, the accused was dismissed from service on 22.09.2025 based on a corruption report sent to the Anti-Corruption Bureau, following which the witness expressed no objection to closing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case