MohanKumar vs Special District Revenue Officer, SIPCOT (LA), Virudhunagar District Sattur. — 104/2022
Case under Landacquisition(amendmentandvalidation)act Section sec.64. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVR010044322021
Filing Number
1281/2021
Filing Date
23-Dec-2021
Registration No
104/2022
Registration Date
18-Feb-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MohanKumar
Adv. G.P.
-
2.Navaneethan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Special District Revenue Officer, SIPCOT (LA), Virudhunagar District Sattur.
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
08-Oct-2025
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Aug-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jul-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2024
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
The court order (MCOP.No.104/2022) dated 09.09.2024 pertains to a motor vehicle accident case under the 1969 Motor Vehicles Act. The court examined evidence regarding a truck (TN 69 K 6851) that lacked proper permit and fitness certificate at the time of the accident, and confirmed that the vehicle owner was fined ₹7,000 for operating without valid documentation. The final order is "Dismissed" (மறு விசாரணை - ஈல்லை). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Sep-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Jun-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
19-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Apr-2023
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
30-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2022
The court order (MCOP.No.104/2022) dated 09.09.2024 pertains to a motor vehicle accident case under the 1969 Motor Vehicles Act. The court examined evidence regarding a truck (TN 69 K 6851) that lacked proper permit and fitness certificate at the time of the accident, and confirmed that the vehicle owner was fined ₹7,000 for operating without valid documentation. The final order is "Dismissed" (மறு விசாரணை - ஈல்லை). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts