Subathirar vs The District Collector Virudhunagar and 4 others — 272/2024
Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 25(b). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR010043952024
Filing Number
1142/2024
Filing Date
19-Aug-2024
Registration No
272/2024
Registration Date
30-Aug-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subathirar
Adv. A Suwathieswaran
-
2.Deepak (Through Power Againt Rajaram)
-
3.Kerthiga (Through Power Againt Rajaram)
Respondent(s)
-
1.The District Collector Virudhunagar and 4 others
-
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Sivakasi
-
3.Varuvai Vatachiyar Watrap
-
4.The Village Administratvie Officer W.Pudhpatti
-
5.Krishnasuba
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
On 09.06.2026, the Additional District Court in Srivilliputhur recorded the cross-examination of the 5th respondent's witness in OS No. 272/2024. The witness, a 52-year-old farmer with 30 years of knowledge about the disputed property ("Thava Saathu"), testified regarding possession, usage, inheritance matters, and the location of the 5th respondent's house relative to a public pathway. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was read back and affirmed by the witness under the Oath Act, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
04-Jun-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
02-Feb-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
20-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Restored
Additional District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
List / Special List
Additional District Judge
-
24-Oct-2025
Disposed
Additional District Judge
-
07-Oct-2025
List / Special List
Additional District Judge
-
08-Aug-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
19-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
03-Jul-2025
IA Pending
Additional District Judge
-
03-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
25-Mar-2025
Written Statement
Additional District Judge
-
25-Feb-2025
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
23-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
06-Dec-2024
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
03-Oct-2024
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
30-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 272/2024
On 09.06.2026, the Additional District Court in Srivilliputhur recorded the cross-examination of the 5th respondent's witness in OS No. 272/2024. The witness, a 52-year-old farmer with 30 years of knowledge about the disputed property ("Thava Saathu"), testified regarding possession, usage, inheritance matters, and the location of the 5th respondent's house relative to a public pathway. The court recorded the witness's testimony, which was read back and affirmed by the witness under the Oath Act, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts