Gnanasekaran vs M/s.Vectra metal International TRA, a partnership firm through its partner K.Saravanan — 259/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22,33(1). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Trial Next hearing 24-Mar-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR010041152024

Filing Number

1079/2024

Filing Date

02-Aug-2024

Registration No

259/2024

Registration Date

19-Aug-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

10-Additional District Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22,33(1)
Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7r1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gnanasekaran

    Adv. Muthukumar T

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/s.Vectra metal International TRA, a partnership firm through its partner K.Saravanan

  2. 2.K.Saravanan

  3. 3.K.Senthilkani

  4. 4.S.Vennila

  5. 5.S.Anitha

  6. 6.R.Raja

  7. 7.Margadarsi Chits Private Ltd., through its Manager

Case History

  1. 24-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Additional Issues

    Additional District Judge

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Additional Issues

    Additional District Judge

  7. 24-Oct-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  8. 24-Oct-2025

    Restored

    Additional District Judge

  9. 24-Oct-2025

    Disposed

    Additional District Judge

  10. 26-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  11. 20-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  12. 02-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  13. 04-Aug-2025

    IA Pending

    Additional District Judge

  14. 24-Jul-2025

    Judgement

    Additional District Judge

  15. 22-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  16. 21-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  18. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  19. 10-Jul-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: In OS No. 259/2024 before the Additional District Court, Srivillliputtur, dated 10.07.2025, the plaintiff (Defendant 1 in the cross-examination) testified that he sought relief only against Defendants 1-6 and not against Defendant 7, and consented to the dismissal of the case with respect to Defendant 7. The court recorded the witness examination and statement accordingly. The case was adjourned without cross-examination following the plaintiff's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  21. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  23. 24-Jun-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  24. 24-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  25. 17-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Additional District Judge

  26. 09-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  27. 02-Jun-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  28. 03-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Additional District Judge

  29. 31-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  30. 29-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  31. 07-Jan-2025

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  32. 28-Oct-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  33. 19-Sep-2024

    Written Statement

    Additional District Judge

  34. 30-Aug-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Judge

  35. 19-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 02-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 259/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS No. 259/2024 before the Additional District Court, Srivillliputtur, dated 10.07.2025, the plaintiff (Defendant 1 in the cross-examination) testified that he sought relief only against Defendants 1-6 and not against Defendant 7, and consented to the dismissal of the case with respect to Defendant 7. The court recorded the witness examination and statement accordingly. The case was adjourned without cross-examination following the plaintiff's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case