Gnanasekaran vs M/s.Vectra metal International TRA, a partnership firm through its partner K.Saravanan — 259/2024

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22,33(1). Status: Trial. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR010041152024

Trial

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

1079/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

259/2024

Registration Date

19-08-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

10-Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22,33(1)
Code of Civil Procedure Section u/o7r1

Petitioner(s)

Gnanasekaran

Adv. Muthukumar T

Respondent(s)

M/s.Vectra metal International TRA, a partnership firm through its partner K.Saravanan

K.Saravanan

K.Senthilkani

S.Vennila

S.Anitha

R.Raja

Margadarsi Chits Private Ltd., through its Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Additional District Judge

17-03-2026

Trial

06-03-2026

Trial

16-12-2025

Trial

01-12-2025

Additional Issues

11-11-2025

Additional Issues

Interim Orders

10-07-2025
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

Summary: In OS No. 259/2024 before the Additional District Court, Srivillliputtur, dated 10.07.2025, the plaintiff (Defendant 1 in the cross-examination) testified that he sought relief only against Defendants 1-6 and not against Defendant 7, and consented to the dismissal of the case with respect to Defendant 7. The court recorded the witness examination and statement accordingly. The case was adjourned without cross-examination following the plaintiff's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In OS No. 259/2024 before the Additional District Court, Srivillliputtur, dated 10.07.2025, the plaintiff (Defendant 1 in the cross-examination) testified that he sought relief only against Defendants 1-6 and not against Defendant 7, and consented to the dismissal of the case with respect to Defendant 7. The court recorded the witness examination and statement accordingly. The case was adjourned without cross-examination following the plaintiff's testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case