Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar. vs Muthu, formerly Municipal Engineer, Incharge Municipal Commissioner, Aruppukottai Municipality — 1/2025
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7,12,13(2),13(1),(d)(ii),13(1),(d)(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.
SPLCC - Special Calendar Case
CNR: TNVR010035832025
Filing Number
2743/2025
Filing Date
02-Aug-2021
Registration No
1/2025
Registration Date
14-Jul-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
06
Police Station
Vigilance and Aniti Coruption
Year
2018
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption, Virudhunagar.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Muthu, formerly Municipal Engineer, Incharge Municipal Commissioner, Aruppukottai Municipality
-
2.C.Thiyagarajan
Case History
-
09-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Jun-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
This is a cross-examination record (DW 1 testimony) dated 11.06.2026 in Special Case No. 01/2025 involving a government witness (Thangamala). The court examined testimony regarding CCTV recordings, documents, and evidence collection procedures in a corruption investigation against the Municipal Engineer of Aruppukottai Municipality. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, read back in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct by the witness. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
27-Jan-2026
Questioning
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
27-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Oct-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
18-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
21-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Aug-2025
Issue of Service
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Jul-2025
For further Proceedings
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Jul-2025
Appearance
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2025
This is a cross-examination record (DW 1 testimony) dated 11.06.2026 in Special Case No. 01/2025 involving a government witness (Thangamala). The court examined testimony regarding CCTV recordings, documents, and evidence collection procedures in a corruption investigation against the Municipal Engineer of Aruppukottai Municipality. The witness's testimony was recorded in open court, read back in the presence of the accused, and admitted as correct by the witness. No re-examination was conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts