Agniammal vs M. Pandi murugan — 155/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,3(1). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNVR010025022022
Filing Number
823/2022
Filing Date
22-Jun-2022
Registration No
155/2022
Registration Date
26-Jul-2022
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Agniammal
Adv. Muniyandi P
-
2.Tamil selvi
Respondent(s)
-
1.M. Pandi murugan
-
2.National Insurance company limited, Branch manager
Case History
-
23-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Additional District Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Orders
Additional District Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
Summary In this Motor Claims Ombudsman Petition (MCOP No: 155/2022) dated 23.01.2026 before the Additional District Court in Srivilliputhur, a witness (Divakar, age 25) was examined and his sworn affidavit was recorded under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1989. The witness testified regarding a vehicle accident insurance claim, confirming that the insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident and that the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Jan-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge
-
19-Jan-2026
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
07-Nov-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
03-Nov-2025
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
14-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Additional District Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF
-
04-Aug-2025
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
24-Apr-2025
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
24-Jan-2025
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
11-Dec-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
29-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
11-Nov-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
27-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
13-Sep-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
08-Jul-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
29-Apr-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
25-Mar-2024
Lok Adalat
Additional District Judge
-
16-Feb-2024
Enquiry
Additional District Judge
-
18-Dec-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
29-Nov-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
07-Oct-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
18-Sep-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
28-Aug-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
11-Jul-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
11-Apr-2023
Counter
Additional District Judge
-
14-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
14-Feb-2023
Restored
Additional District Judge
-
14-Feb-2023
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
07-Nov-2022
Disposed
Additional District Judge
-
23-Sep-2022
Batta
Additional District Judge
-
12-Sep-2022
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
04-Aug-2022
Issue of Service
Additional District Judge
-
26-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 155/2022
Summary In this Motor Claims Ombudsman Petition (MCOP No: 155/2022) dated 23.01.2026 before the Additional District Court in Srivilliputhur, a witness (Divakar, age 25) was examined and his sworn affidavit was recorded under Section 44 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1989. The witness testified regarding a vehicle accident insurance claim, confirming that the insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident and that the insurance company is liable to pay the compensation amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts