Paulraj and 2 others vs Madhialagan and one another — 80/2023
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140,166. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNVR010024872023
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
407/2023
Filing Date
13-04-2023
Registration No
80/2023
Registration Date
19-04-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Paulraj and 2 others
Adv. EMARAJAN M
Kalaiselvi
Minor. Nitheshraj
Respondent(s)
Madhialagan and one another
TNSTC, Nagarkovil Kottam, Nagarkovil, Through its Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional District Judge
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 12-01-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Summary: In MCOP No. 80/2023 dated 07.11.2025 before the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur, the witness Madhiyalagan (bus driver, age 52) was examined on oath. During cross-examination, the witness admitted that he was driving government bus TN 74 N 1840 at the time of the accident and that an FIR was filed against him at Virudunagar Bazaar police station, but he retracted his earlier sworn affidavit statement blaming the deceased Sivakumar's negligence and instead accepted full responsibility for causing the accident due to his own carelessness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In MCOP No. 80/2023 dated 07.11.2025 before the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur, the witness Madhiyalagan (bus driver, age 52) was examined on oath. During cross-examination, the witness admitted that he was driving government bus TN 74 N 1840 at the time of the accident and that an FIR was filed against him at Virudunagar Bazaar police station, but he retracted his earlier sworn affidavit statement blaming the deceased Sivakumar's negligence and instead accepted full responsibility for causing the accident due to his own carelessness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts