M.Kavitha and three others vs Mohanraj and one another — 91/2023

Case under Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVR010021872023

Evidence

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

336/2023

Filing Date

29-03-2023

Registration No

91/2023

Registration Date

05-04-2023

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Acts & Sections

Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 22
Code of Civil Procedure Section O.6,R.14(A)

Petitioner(s)

M.Kavitha and three others

Adv. ASHOK KUMAR R

Subha

Usha

Indhumathi

Respondent(s)

Mohanraj and one another

Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu EB Board, Virudhunagar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

06-03-2026

Evidence

27-02-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

13-02-2026

Evidence

07-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

23-07-2025
IA
23-07-2025
IA
24-10-2025
Copy of Deposition/Evidence

Summary In O.S. No. 91/2023 dated 24.10.2025, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the first defendant (Arun Siddhanth Ali) in a death case involving an individual named Muniswamy who died from electrocution. The witness testified regarding electrical wiring, meter boxes, and the location where the deceased was found, with disputes about the accuracy of survey maps and evidence documentation. Cross-examination was completed with no re-examination required; the testimony was recorded and verified in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In O.S. No. 91/2023 dated 24.10.2025, the court recorded the cross-examination testimony of the first defendant (Arun Siddhanth Ali) in a death case involving an individual named Muniswamy who died from electrocution. The witness testified regarding electrical wiring, meter boxes, and the location where the deceased was found, with disputes about the accuracy of survey maps and evidence documentation. Cross-examination was completed with no re-examination required; the testimony was recorded and verified in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case