Subbulakshmi vs Kanagaraj — 117/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order7rule1. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR010019112024
e-Filing Number
03-04-2024
Filing Number
509/2024
Filing Date
06-04-2024
Registration No
117/2024
Registration Date
29-04-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subbulakshmi
Adv. sureshbabu M
Sulochana
Adv. sureshbabu M
Rajaguru
Adv. sureshbabu M
Respondent(s)
Kanagaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional District Judge
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 17-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 06-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 27-02-2026 | Judgement |
Final Orders / Judgements
Copy of Judgment
Copy of Judgment
Interim Orders
This is a recorded statement (examination-in-chief) of the plaintiff in an Original Suit (OS No. 117/2024) filed in the Additional District Court, Virudunagar, dated 01.12.2025. The plaintiff testified under oath regarding a family property dispute involving seven properties that were allegedly inherited or ancestrally owned by the plaintiff's family. The plaintiff claimed ownership of these properties through ancestral succession and a deed of settlement allegedly executed by the deceased father, but also admitted to have gifted one property (Survey No. 871) to the fourth defendant through a sale deed. The court recorded the plaintiff's detailed testimony concerning the chain of ownership, family partition dated 07.06.1991, and the contested deed of settlement dated 03.01.2022, along with the plaintiff's assertion regarding the entitlements of co-heirs under Hindu succession law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a recorded statement (examination-in-chief) of the plaintiff in an Original Suit (OS No. 117/2024) filed in the Additional District Court, Virudunagar, dated 01.12.2025. The plaintiff testified under oath regarding a family property dispute involving seven properties that were allegedly inherited or ancestrally owned by the plaintiff's family. The plaintiff claimed ownership of these properties through ancestral succession and a deed of settlement allegedly executed by the deceased father, but also admitted to have gifted one property (Survey No. 871) to the fourth defendant through a sale deed. The court recorded the plaintiff's detailed testimony concerning the chain of ownership, family partition dated 07.06.1991, and the contested deed of settlement dated 03.01.2022, along with the plaintiff's assertion regarding the entitlements of co-heirs under Hindu succession law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts