K. Marimuthu vs A. Ariram Chet — 80/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR6, R14(a). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR010018742023
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
281/2023
Filing Date
17-03-2023
Registration No
80/2023
Registration Date
20-03-2023
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K. Marimuthu
Adv. Kanagaraj P
Respondent(s)
A. Ariram Chet
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional District Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary In OS No. 80/2023 before the Additional District Court, Virudunagar (dated 01.12.2025), the court recorded cross-examination of the defendant witness in a mortgage loan dispute. The defendant admitted to borrowing ₹13 lakhs on 04.09.2013 but contested the repayment terms and interest calculations claimed by the plaintiff. The court found the defendant's testimony inconsistent and lacking supporting documentary evidence for his claims of installment payments and interest payments. The petition was dismissed, and the defendant was held liable to pay the principal amount of ₹13 lakhs with applicable interest as per the mortgage deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In OS No. 80/2023 before the Additional District Court, Virudunagar (dated 01.12.2025), the court recorded cross-examination of the defendant witness in a mortgage loan dispute. The defendant admitted to borrowing ₹13 lakhs on 04.09.2013 but contested the repayment terms and interest calculations claimed by the plaintiff. The court found the defendant's testimony inconsistent and lacking supporting documentary evidence for his claims of installment payments and interest payments. The petition was dismissed, and the defendant was held liable to pay the principal amount of ₹13 lakhs with applicable interest as per the mortgage deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts