Prabhakaran vs Subburaj — 11/2020

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNVR010014942019

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

1304/2019

Filing Date

04-12-2019

Registration No

11/2020

Registration Date

25-08-2020

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

10-Additional District Judge

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O21R11

Petitioner(s)

Prabhakaran

Adv. D.Ravichandran

Respondent(s)

Subburaj

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Additional District Judge

06-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

18-12-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

31-10-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

08-09-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

29-08-2025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

06-01-2024
IA

Summary The petition was allowed conditionally. The Additional District Court restored execution application E.A. 1/2021, which had been dismissed for default on 26.10.2022 due to the petitioner's non-appearance. However, the court imposed Rs. 5,000 as costs payable to the first respondent by 18.01.2024, with the petition standing dismissed upon non-compliance. The court found it necessary in the interests of justice to grant the petitioner another opportunity to substantiate his claim over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition was allowed conditionally. The Additional District Court restored execution application E.A. 1/2021, which had been dismissed for default on 26.10.2022 due to the petitioner's non-appearance. However, the court imposed Rs. 5,000 as costs payable to the first respondent by 18.01.2024, with the petition standing dismissed upon non-compliance. The court found it necessary in the interests of justice to grant the petitioner another opportunity to substantiate his claim over the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case