Manivairam (A vs SI of Police Nathampatty PS — 832/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 24th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR010014872026
e-Filing Number
18-03-2026
Filing Number
1104/2026
Filing Date
18-Mar-2026
Registration No
832/2026
Registration Date
18-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 30-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
Nathampatti P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manivairam (A
-
2.Dineshkumar (A
-
3.Pandilakshmi (A
-
4.Karupayee(A
Respondent(s)
-
1.SI of Police Nathampatty PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to four accused (Manivairam, Dineshkumar, Pandilakshmi, and Karupayee) charged with abuse, assault, and threats arising from a land dispute incident on 10-03-2026. The court found the case stemmed from an existing civil dispute and that the injured party was discharged from hospital, warranting conditional bail with a Rs.10,000 personal bond, daily police reporting at 6pm, and restrictions on absconding, tampering with evidence, and intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 832/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to four accused (Manivairam, Dineshkumar, Pandilakshmi, and Karupayee) charged with abuse, assault, and threats arising from a land dispute incident on 10-03-2026. The court found the case stemmed from an existing civil dispute and that the injured party was discharged from hospital, warranting conditional bail with a Rs.10,000 personal bond, daily police reporting at 6pm, and restrictions on absconding, tampering with evidence, and intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts