Thangamudi vs The Inspector of Police, Nathampatti P.S — 789/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR010013832026
e-Filing Number
13-03-2026
Filing Number
1037/2026
Filing Date
13-Mar-2026
Registration No
789/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
Nathampatti P.S.
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thangamudi
Adv. Ranjith Ranjith
-
2.Rathika
-
3.Kesavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, Nathampatti P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The court granted anticipatory bail to the three accused (Thangamudi, Rathika, and Kesavan) charged with abusing, assaulting, and harassing a woman over a property dispute involving grazing of livestock. The court found that the underlying cause was a land dispute and the injured party was discharged from hospital, warranting bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, daily police reporting, and prohibitions on absconding, tampering with evidence, or intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 789/2026
The court granted anticipatory bail to the three accused (Thangamudi, Rathika, and Kesavan) charged with abusing, assaulting, and harassing a woman over a property dispute involving grazing of livestock. The court found that the underlying cause was a land dispute and the injured party was discharged from hospital, warranting bail with stringent conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond, daily police reporting, and prohibitions on absconding, tampering with evidence, or intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts