Tamilarasan vs The Inspector of Police, Watrap P.S — 778/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNVR010013652026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
1028/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
778/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
65
Police Station
Watrap
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Tamilarasan
Adv. Onnazhagan M
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, Watrap P.S
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 778/2026 Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Tamilarasan, accused of illegal firecracker manufacturing without license under BNS §288 and Indian Explosives Act §9(B)(i)(a). The court found no untoward incident occurred and noted that co-accused A1 and A2 had already been released on bail, justifying similar relief for the petitioner. Conditions: Rs.10,000 personal bond with two sureties; appearance before police as required; prohibition on absconding, evidence tampering, or witness intimidation; availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Principal District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 778/2026
Case 778/2026 Summary The Principal District and Sessions Judge granted anticipatory bail to Tamilarasan, accused of illegal firecracker manufacturing without license under BNS §288 and Indian Explosives Act §9(B)(i)(a). The court found no untoward incident occurred and noted that co-accused A1 and A2 had already been released on bail, justifying similar relief for the petitioner. Conditions: Rs.10,000 personal bond with two sureties; appearance before police as required; prohibition on absconding, evidence tampering, or witness intimidation; availability for interrogation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts