Anbuselvam vs The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Bazaar P.S — 686/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR010012252026

Filing Number

913/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

686/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

07

Police Station

VirudhunagarBazaar P.S.

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),238

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anbuselvam

    Adv. K. Dharmalingam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Virudhunagar Bazaar P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The court granted bail to Anbuselvam (A2), accused in a murder case where he allegedly killed Ponraj Vignesh and set fire to the body on 07-01-2026. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 68 days, investigation was completed, and he was a history-sheeted rowdy; however, the prolonged custody warranted bail with strict conditions including a Rs.25,000 bond, daily police reporting at 6 pm, and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence/witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Enquiry

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 686/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to Anbuselvam (A2), accused in a murder case where he allegedly killed Ponraj Vignesh and set fire to the body on 07-01-2026. The court considered that the petitioner had been in custody for 68 days, investigation was completed, and he was a history-sheeted rowdy; however, the prolonged custody warranted bail with strict conditions including a Rs.25,000 bond, daily police reporting at 6 pm, and prohibitions on absconding or tampering with evidence/witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case