Eswaran vs The Inspector of Police, Koomapatti P.S — 678/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR010012002026

Filing Number

890/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

678/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(i)(b)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2)
Mines & Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 Section 21(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Eswaran

    Adv. S Sangilimadan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Koomapatti P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar, granted accused Eswaran's petition to relax conditions imposed in an earlier order (Cr.M.P. No. 348/2026) in a case involving alleged violations under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. The court fully relaxed the conditions after finding that the petitioner had faithfully observed them for 17 days without deviation and demonstrated considerable hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 678/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar, granted accused Eswaran's petition to relax conditions imposed in an earlier order (Cr.M.P. No. 348/2026) in a case involving alleged violations under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act. The court fully relaxed the conditions after finding that the petitioner had faithfully observed them for 17 days without deviation and demonstrated considerable hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case