Mareeswaran vs The Inspector of Police, Watrap P.S — 679/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNVR010011992026

Filing Number

889/2026

Filing Date

04-Mar-2026

Registration No

679/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Allowed

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)(b)
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 288
Explosives Act, 1884 Section 9(B)(1)(a),9(B)(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mareeswaran

    Adv. Muniyandi S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Inspector of Police, Watrap P.S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar, granted the petition filed by accused Mareeswaran (A7) under Section 483(1)(b) of BNSS for relaxation of conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court fully relaxed the conditions after finding that the petitioner had complied with them for 15 days without deviation and demonstrated considerable hardship, with the Public Prosecutor conceding the petitioner's compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 679/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar, granted the petition filed by accused Mareeswaran (A7) under Section 483(1)(b) of BNSS for relaxation of conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court fully relaxed the conditions after finding that the petitioner had complied with them for 15 days without deviation and demonstrated considerable hardship, with the Public Prosecutor conceding the petitioner's compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case