G.Velmurugan and one another vs E.Gurusamy and one another — 161/2020
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
MCOP - Motor Accidents Claim Original Petition
CNR: TNVR010011632020
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
597/2020
Filing Date
06-10-2020
Registration No
161/2020
Registration Date
14-10-2020
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G.Velmurugan and one another
Adv. DHEENADHAYALAN C
V. Packialakshmi
Respondent(s)
E.Gurusamy and one another
Branch Manager, National Insurance company ltd,
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional District Judge
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Orders |
| 06-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 26-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court order from the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur (MCOP No: 161/2020, dated 17.02.2026) recording witness examination in a motor vehicle accident case (FIR No. 225/2019 under IPC sections 279, 304A). The witness testimony documents that an FIR was registered based on a complaint by Mathiyalagan regarding a vehicle accident, but was later closed (MOF - Closure report) after investigation found no merit in the allegations, with the witness suggesting the complainant may have fabricated the incident for monetary gain. The court has allowed re-examination of the witness and the testimony has been recorded and sworn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court order from the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur (MCOP No: 161/2020, dated 17.02.2026) recording witness examination in a motor vehicle accident case (FIR No. 225/2019 under IPC sections 279, 304A). The witness testimony documents that an FIR was registered based on a complaint by Mathiyalagan regarding a vehicle accident, but was later closed (MOF - Closure report) after investigation found no merit in the allegations, with the witness suggesting the complainant may have fabricated the incident for monetary gain. The court has allowed re-examination of the witness and the testimony has been recorded and sworn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts