D. Suresh vs Ramasamy — 100089/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,14A. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVR010008212018
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
100089/2018
Filing Date
23-08-2018
Registration No
100089/2018
Registration Date
23-08-2018
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
D. Suresh
Adv. P. Pavunraj
Respondent(s)
Ramasamy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 27-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 28-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 19-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 20-11-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Petition Dismissed The Principal District Court, Virudhunagar dismissed the petitioner's petition to amend the previous order to include thumb impression comparison along with signature comparison by a forensic expert. The court found that the thumb impression on the promissory note was unclear and not properly obtained, making it unsuitable for forensic comparison. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Petition Dismissed The Principal District Court, Virudhunagar dismissed the petitioner's petition to amend the previous order to include thumb impression comparison along with signature comparison by a forensic expert. The court found that the thumb impression on the promissory note was unclear and not properly obtained, making it unsuitable for forensic comparison. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts