SREE HANUMAN COTTON SPINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER SAGAR SUDHAKAR SETTY vs MS SPINNERS REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER — 4/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section US22OFTAMILNADUCOURTFEEANDSUITVALUATIONACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
COS - Commercial Original Suit
CNR: TNVR010006932025
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
e-Filing Number
22-01-2025
Filing Number
132/2025
Filing Date
05-02-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
09-04-2025
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SREE HANUMAN COTTON SPINNING AND PRESSING FACTORY THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER SAGAR SUDHAKAR SETTY
Adv. BOJARAJAN M
Respondent(s)
MS SPINNERS REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 04/2025 dated 11.02.2026, the court ruled on a commercial dispute involving cotton bales between a partnership firm (plaintiff) and the defendants. The court determined that the defendants are liable to pay Rs. 17,31,963/- (calculated at Rs. 12,872 per quintal for 185 quintals of cotton) to the plaintiff, and ordered the defendants to pay the court fees related to the case. The defendant's cross-examination testimony was admitted and verified as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Civil Suit No. 04/2025 dated 11.02.2026, the court ruled on a commercial dispute involving cotton bales between a partnership firm (plaintiff) and the defendants. The court determined that the defendants are liable to pay Rs. 17,31,963/- (calculated at Rs. 12,872 per quintal for 185 quintals of cotton) to the plaintiff, and ordered the defendants to pay the court fees related to the case. The defendant's cross-examination testimony was admitted and verified as correct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts