Murugeswari vs Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies — 14/2025

Case under Tn Cooperative Societies Act , 1983 Section 152(1)(a). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

CMA - Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

CNR: TNVR010006632025

Filing Number

119/2025

Filing Date

05-Feb-2025

Registration No

14/2025

Registration Date

12-Jun-2025

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Tn Cooperative Societies Act , 1983 Section 152(1)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Murugeswari

    Adv. R Selvaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies

  2. 2.Joint Registrar Cooperative Societies

  3. 3.Joint Registrar/Managing director of virudhunagar district ,central co operative bank

  4. 4.Administrator, RA 362,Rajapalayam Municipal Scavenger employees co operative thrift and credit Societies limited

  5. 5.Sales Officer, Office of the Deputy registar of co operative societies

  6. 6.Inspection officer, Office of the Deputy registar of Co operative Societies

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    IAView PDF

    Case Summary: Murugeswari v. Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Case No. 14/2025 | I.A. No. 3/2026 | Principal District Court, Virudhunagar Outcome: Petition Allowed The court allowed Murugeswari's petition to admit 30 additional documents as evidence in her pending appeal against a surcharge order. The petitioner, a former Secretary of a cooperative society, sought to introduce documents that were discovered after arguments concluded, including a prior review petition order that found no financial loss or irregularity caused by her conduct. The court granted permission in the interest of justice to ensure fair trial, finding the petitioner's reasons reasonable despite respondents' objections that the late filing was dilatory. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  10. 23-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  12. 02-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  13. 19-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  14. 17-Oct-2025

    Await Records

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  15. 19-Sep-2025

    Await Records

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  16. 12-Aug-2025

    Await Records

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  17. 15-Jul-2025

    Issue of Service

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  18. 12-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 05-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Murugeswari v. Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies Case No. 14/2025 | I.A. No. 3/2026 | Principal District Court, Virudhunagar Outcome: Petition Allowed The court allowed Murugeswari's petition to admit 30 additional documents as evidence in her pending appeal against a surcharge order. The petitioner, a former Secretary of a cooperative society, sought to introduce documents that were discovered after arguments concluded, including a prior review petition order that found no financial loss or irregularity caused by her conduct. The court granted permission in the interest of justice to ensure fair trial, finding the petitioner's reasons reasonable despite respondents' objections that the late filing was dilatory. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case