Maheswari And Two Others vs The Executive Director, Tamilnadu State Government Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Division — 45/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140, 141, 163A, 163B, 166 & 182A. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OP - Original Petition
CNR: TNVR010004812024
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
11-01-2024
Filing Number
112/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
45/2024
Registration Date
06-02-2024
Court
Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar
Judge
10-Additional District Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maheswari And Two Others
Adv. Thirumalaiappan S
Respondent(s)
The Executive Director, Tamilnadu State Government Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Division
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional District Judge
Orders
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Orders |
| 02-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this cross-examination (MCOP No. 45/2024) dated 23.02.2026 before the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur, a bus driver witness admitted under oath that negligence and lack of attention on his part caused the accident. The driver acknowledged starting the bus before the conductor's signal and accepted that his company is liable to pay compensation to the petitioners for the accident. The case proceedings concluded with the witness's testimony being recorded and affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this cross-examination (MCOP No. 45/2024) dated 23.02.2026 before the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur, a bus driver witness admitted under oath that negligence and lack of attention on his part caused the accident. The driver acknowledged starting the bus before the conductor's signal and accepted that his company is liable to pay compensation to the petitioners for the accident. The case proceedings concluded with the witness's testimony being recorded and affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts