Maheswari And Two Others vs The Executive Director, Tamilnadu State Government Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Division — 45/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140, 141, 163A, 163B, 166 & 182A. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Orders Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OP - Original Petition

CNR: TNVR010004812024

e-Filing Number

11-01-2024

Filing Number

112/2024

Filing Date

23-Jan-2024

Registration No

45/2024

Registration Date

06-Feb-2024

Court

Principal District Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar

Judge

10-Additional District Judge

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 140, 141, 163A, 163B, 166 & 182A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Maheswari And Two Others

    Adv. Thirumalaiappan S

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Executive Director, Tamilnadu State Government Transport Corporation, Virudhunagar Division

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Additional District Judge

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

    Summary: In this cross-examination (MCOP No. 45/2024) dated 23.02.2026 before the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur, a bus driver witness admitted under oath that negligence and lack of attention on his part caused the accident. The driver acknowledged starting the bus before the conductor's signal and accepted that his company is liable to pay compensation to the petitioners for the accident. The case proceedings concluded with the witness's testimony being recorded and affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Additional District Judge

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  11. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  12. 24-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  14. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  16. 16-Sep-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  18. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Copy of Deposition/EvidenceView PDF

  20. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  21. 14-Jul-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  22. 30-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  23. 09-Jun-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  24. 07-Feb-2025

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  25. 13-Dec-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  26. 21-Oct-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  27. 30-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Additional District Judge

  28. 09-Aug-2024

    Ex-Parte Evidence

    Additional District Judge

  29. 02-Aug-2024

    Counter

    Additional District Judge

  30. 16-Jul-2024

    Counter

    Additional District Judge

  31. 24-Jun-2024

    Counter

    Additional District Judge

  32. 15-Apr-2024

    Counter

    Additional District Judge

  33. 06-Mar-2024

    Issue of Service

    Additional District Judge

  34. 06-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 23-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this cross-examination (MCOP No. 45/2024) dated 23.02.2026 before the Additional District Court, Srivilliputhur, a bus driver witness admitted under oath that negligence and lack of attention on his part caused the accident. The driver acknowledged starting the bus before the conductor's signal and accepted that his company is liable to pay compensation to the petitioners for the accident. The case proceedings concluded with the witness's testimony being recorded and affirmed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case