SHO KKM PEW CR NO 481 2025 vs CHANDRASEKAR — 806/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C) 4(1)(A) 14A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP360036452025
e-Filing Number
29-10-2025
Filing Number
3644/2025
Filing Date
01-11-2025
Registration No
806/2025
Registration Date
07-11-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
481
Police Station
P.E. Wing Kottakuppam
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) KKM PEW CR NO 481 2025
Adv. Sun Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
CHANDRASEKAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Questioning
Questioning
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-06-2026 | Judgement |
| 21-05-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-05-2026 | Questioning |
| 19-05-2026 | Questioning |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 806/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the respondent Chandrasekar of charges under Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2024, sections 4(1)(C), 4(1)(A), and 14(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies contained material contradictions and inconsistencies regarding the seizure of 40 bottles of MC Dowells Gold Indian Brandy on 11-10-2025. Specifically, witness statements about the vehicle registration number, seizure procedures, and handling of evidence lacked credibility. The court concluded that the respondent was not established as the person in possession of the contraband liquor, as the evidence did not definitively prove his culpability beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 806/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the respondent Chandrasekar of charges under Tamil Nadu Prohibition (Amendment) Act 2024, sections 4(1)(C), 4(1)(A), and 14(A), finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the prosecution witnesses' testimonies contained material contradictions and inconsistencies regarding the seizure of 40 bottles of MC Dowells Gold Indian Brandy on 11-10-2025. Specifically, witness statements about the vehicle registration number, seizure procedures, and handling of evidence lacked credibility. The court concluded that the respondent was not established as the person in possession of the contraband liquor, as the evidence did not definitively prove his culpability beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts