SHO KKM PEW vs SUNDAR — 517/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a) 4(1)(C) 4(1)(h) 4(1)(A) 14A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 07th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP360027342025
e-Filing Number
03-09-2025
Filing Number
2733/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
517/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
159
Police Station
P.E. Wing Kottakuppam
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) KKM PEW
Respondent(s)
SUNDAR
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 517/2025 Summary: On 04-05-2025, police arrested two accused (Sundar and Raman) with a vehicle containing 48 bottles of Mansion House brandy (3 bottles in perfect condition). They were charged under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024 sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(C), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), and 14(A) for illegal liquor transport. The court found inconsistencies in witness statements and contradictions regarding seizure procedures, determining the accused were not prima facie offenders. The court acquitted both accused, finding the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case 517/2025 Summary: On 04-05-2025, police arrested two accused (Sundar and Raman) with a vehicle containing 48 bottles of Mansion House brandy (3 bottles in perfect condition). They were charged under Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024 sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(C), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), and 14(A) for illegal liquor transport. The court found inconsistencies in witness statements and contradictions regarding seizure procedures, determining the accused were not prima facie offenders. The court acquitted both accused, finding the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts