SHO KKM PEW CR NO 365/2025 vs VASUKI — 479/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(C) 4(1)(A). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 27th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP360026592025
e-Filing Number
31-08-2025
Filing Number
2658/2025
Filing Date
31-Aug-2025
Registration No
479/2025
Registration Date
04-Sep-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 01-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
365
Police Station
P.E. Wing Kottakuppam
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHO (Station House Officer) KKM PEW CR NO 365/2025
Adv. Sun Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
-
1.VASUKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
Copy of Judgment
The court acquitted the accused Vasuki, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a case under sections 4(1)(C) and 4(1)(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused was the actual offender, noting inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of proper corroboration of the seized liquor (Blue Grape Brandy and Majestic Indian Brandy). The accused was discharged and released under BNSS section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
13-Feb-2026
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
09-Feb-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
17-Nov-2025
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate Vanur
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 479/2025
The court acquitted the accused Vasuki, holding that the prosecution failed to establish a case under sections 4(1)(C) and 4(1)(A) of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the accused was the actual offender, noting inconsistencies in witness testimonies and lack of proper corroboration of the seized liquor (Blue Grape Brandy and Majestic Indian Brandy). The accused was discharged and released under BNSS section 271(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts