SHO Kottakuppam PEW PS vs Ajithkumar — 313/2025

Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a),4(1)(C),4(1)(h),4(1)(A),14A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP360019192025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-04-2025

Filing Number

1919/2025

Filing Date

23-06-2025

Registration No

313/2025

Registration Date

23-06-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

P.E. Wing Kottakuppam

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a),4(1)(C),4(1)(h),4(1)(A),14A
Mp/1/2026 Classification : 70 (2) Cr.pc Section SHO Kottakuppam PEW PS

Petitioner(s)

SHO (Station House Officer) Kottakuppam PEW PS (Police Station)

Adv. Sun Inspector of Police

Respondent(s)

Ajithkumar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

30-03-2026

Disposed

26-03-2026

Evidence

18-03-2026

Evidence

17-03-2026

Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

16-03-2026

Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: 313/2025 Court Decision: The Magistrate Court discharged the accused (Ajithkumar) under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence that he was the actual offender. The court determined that while 45 bottles of Majestic Indian Brandy were seized from a vehicle on 02-01-2025, the witnesses' testimonies were inconsistent and failed to conclusively establish the accused's culpability, particularly regarding ownership and knowledge of the contraband alcohol. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural and evidentiary deficiencies, including: witnesses providing conflicting accounts, absence of independent corroboration, failure to establish a clear chain of custody, and the investigating officers' failure to properly document the seizure. The court ruled that the prosecution's case lacked the necessary credibility to sustain conviction under sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(C), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), and 14(A) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 313/2025 Court Decision: The Magistrate Court discharged the accused (Ajithkumar) under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence that he was the actual offender. The court determined that while 45 bottles of Majestic Indian Brandy were seized from a vehicle on 02-01-2025, the witnesses' testimonies were inconsistent and failed to conclusively establish the accused's culpability, particularly regarding ownership and knowledge of the contraband alcohol. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural and evidentiary deficiencies, including: witnesses providing conflicting accounts, absence of independent corroboration, failure to establish a clear chain of custody, and the investigating officers' failure to properly document the seizure. The court ruled that the prosecution's case lacked the necessary credibility to sustain conviction under sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(C), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), and 14(A) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case