SHO Kottakuppam PEW PS vs Ajithkumar — 313/2025
Case under Tn Prohibition Act Section 4(1)(a),4(1)(C),4(1)(h),4(1)(A),14A. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 30th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNVP360019192025
e-Filing Number
25-04-2025
Filing Number
1919/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
313/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
1
Police Station
P.E. Wing Kottakuppam
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer) Kottakuppam PEW PS (Police Station)
Adv. Sun Inspector of Police
Respondent(s)
Ajithkumar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
| 16-03-2026 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 313/2025 Court Decision: The Magistrate Court discharged the accused (Ajithkumar) under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence that he was the actual offender. The court determined that while 45 bottles of Majestic Indian Brandy were seized from a vehicle on 02-01-2025, the witnesses' testimonies were inconsistent and failed to conclusively establish the accused's culpability, particularly regarding ownership and knowledge of the contraband alcohol. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural and evidentiary deficiencies, including: witnesses providing conflicting accounts, absence of independent corroboration, failure to establish a clear chain of custody, and the investigating officers' failure to properly document the seizure. The court ruled that the prosecution's case lacked the necessary credibility to sustain conviction under sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(C), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), and 14(A) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 313/2025 Court Decision: The Magistrate Court discharged the accused (Ajithkumar) under the Tamil Nadu Prohibition Amendment Act 2024, finding insufficient evidence that he was the actual offender. The court determined that while 45 bottles of Majestic Indian Brandy were seized from a vehicle on 02-01-2025, the witnesses' testimonies were inconsistent and failed to conclusively establish the accused's culpability, particularly regarding ownership and knowledge of the contraband alcohol. Key Reasoning: The court noted critical procedural and evidentiary deficiencies, including: witnesses providing conflicting accounts, absence of independent corroboration, failure to establish a clear chain of custody, and the investigating officers' failure to properly document the seizure. The court ruled that the prosecution's case lacked the necessary credibility to sustain conviction under sections 4(1)(a), 4(1)(C), 4(1)(h), 4(1)(A), and 14(A) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts