Thangavel Finance, Rep. by Ravichandran vs Krishnaveni — 20/2019

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142,138. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 24-Jun-2026

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP360004322025

Filing Number

432/2025

Filing Date

02-Mar-2019

Registration No

20/2019

Registration Date

02-Mar-2019

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 142,138
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 70 (2) Cr.pc Section Thangavel Finance, Rep. by Ravichandran
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Thangavel Finance, Rep. by Ravichandran
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Thangavel Finance, Rep. by Ravichandran
Mp/5/2026 Classification : 256 Cr.pc Section Thangavel Finance, Rep. by Ravichandran

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Thangavel Finance, Rep. by Ravichandran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Krishnaveni

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  10. 02-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC No. 20/2019 Court: Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur Parties: Thangavel Finance (Rep. by Ravichandran) v. Krishnaveni Document Type: Witness Deposition (PW1 - Defence) Witness: Ravichandran (Defence Witness) Date of Deposition: 2nd March 2026 Summary: This document records the deposition of Ravichandran as a defence witness in a case involving a loan dispute. Ravichandran testified that he has been operating a finance business since 2017 and provided a loan to the respondent Krishnaveni. He stated that the loan amount and terms were recorded in his accounts, that monthly interest payments were received via NEFT, and that he maintained proper documentation. The witness denied allegations of coercion or improper lending practices, asserting that all transactions followed standard business procedures and were properly documented in his office records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  13. 04-Feb-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  15. 07-Jan-2026

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  16. 17-Dec-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  17. 28-Nov-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  18. 12-Nov-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  19. 15-Oct-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  20. 20-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  21. 12-Sep-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  22. 11-Aug-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  23. 09-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  24. 02-Jul-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  25. 11-Jun-2025

    Trial

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  26. 05-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 02-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC No. 20/2019 Court: Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur Parties: Thangavel Finance (Rep. by Ravichandran) v. Krishnaveni Document Type: Witness Deposition (PW1 - Defence) Witness: Ravichandran (Defence Witness) Date of Deposition: 2nd March 2026 Summary: This document records the deposition of Ravichandran as a defence witness in a case involving a loan dispute. Ravichandran testified that he has been operating a finance business since 2017 and provided a loan to the respondent Krishnaveni. He stated that the loan amount and terms were recorded in his accounts, that monthly interest payments were received via NEFT, and that he maintained proper documentation. The witness denied allegations of coercion or improper lending practices, asserting that all transactions followed standard business procedures and were properly documented in his office records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case