APP vs Baskar — 30/2015

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)IPC. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 21st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP360000622025

Filing Number

62/2025

Filing Date

28-May-2015

Registration No

30/2015

Registration Date

28-May-2015

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur

Judge

3-Judicial Magistrate Vanur

Decision Date

21-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

176

Police Station

Vanur P.S.

Year

2014

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)IPC
Mp/4/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section APP
Mp/5/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section APP
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section APP
Mp/7/2026 Classification : 70 (2) Cr.pc Section APP

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Baskar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 30/2015 Summary: Accused Baskar was charged with rash/negligent driving (IPC §279) and causing death by negligence (§304A) after a lorry collision killed a motorcyclist on 15.08.2014. The court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key eyewitnesses (PW2, PW4, PW5) turned hostile and none identified the accused as the driver; no witness testified to how the vehicle was driven negligently, and no direct evidence linked the accused's driving to the death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  6. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  11. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  12. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  13. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  16. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  17. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  18. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  19. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  20. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  21. 21-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  22. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  23. 24-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  24. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  25. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  26. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  27. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  28. 18-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  29. 08-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  30. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  31. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  32. 19-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  33. 16-May-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  34. 28-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  35. 23-Apr-2025

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    Judicial Magistrate Vanur

  36. 07-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 28-May-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. 30/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Case 30/2015 Summary: Accused Baskar was charged with rash/negligent driving (IPC §279) and causing death by negligence (§304A) after a lorry collision killed a motorcyclist on 15.08.2014. The court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key eyewitnesses (PW2, PW4, PW5) turned hostile and none identified the accused as the driver; no witness testified to how the vehicle was driven negligently, and no direct evidence linked the accused's driving to the death. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case