Venkatasubbu vs Rajesh — 72/2019
Case under --- Section 25(b). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP350001042025
Filing Number
104/2025
Filing Date
20-03-2019
Registration No
72/2019
Registration Date
20-03-2019
Court
District Munsif Court, Vanur
Judge
2-District Munsif Vanur
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkatasubbu
Respondent(s)
Rajesh
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif Vanur
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 25-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S.No. 72/2019 Court Decision: The District Munsif Court, Vanur dismissed the plaintiff's suit with no decree. The court ruled that the plaintiff (Venkatasubbu) has no absolute right or title over the disputed agricultural property in Akasampattu village. The property was donated to three temples (Sri Veda Vinayagar, Pidari Selliyamman, and Sri Mari Sengalaneersamnman temples) by deed of settlement dated 14.11.1935, and the temples retain ownership. The plaintiff's 2000 sale deed from a previous owner (Venukapala Naidu) was invalid as that person lacked legal authority to transfer temple property without religious department permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S.No. 72/2019 Court Decision: The District Munsif Court, Vanur dismissed the plaintiff's suit with no decree. The court ruled that the plaintiff (Venkatasubbu) has no absolute right or title over the disputed agricultural property in Akasampattu village. The property was donated to three temples (Sri Veda Vinayagar, Pidari Selliyamman, and Sri Mari Sengalaneersamnman temples) by deed of settlement dated 14.11.1935, and the temples retain ownership. The plaintiff's 2000 sale deed from a previous owner (Venukapala Naidu) was invalid as that person lacked legal authority to transfer temple property without religious department permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts