Venkatasubbu vs Rajesh — 72/2019

Case under --- Section 25(b). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVP350001042025

Filing Number

104/2025

Filing Date

20-Mar-2019

Registration No

72/2019

Registration Date

20-Mar-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Vanur

Judge

2-District Munsif Vanur

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

--- Section 25(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Venkatasubbu

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S.No. 72/2019 Court Decision: The District Munsif Court, Vanur dismissed the plaintiff's suit with no decree. The court ruled that the plaintiff (Venkatasubbu) has no absolute right or title over the disputed agricultural property in Akasampattu village. The property was donated to three temples (Sri Veda Vinayagar, Pidari Selliyamman, and Sri Mari Sengalaneersamnman temples) by deed of settlement dated 14.11.1935, and the temples retain ownership. The plaintiff's 2000 sale deed from a previous owner (Venukapala Naidu) was invalid as that person lacked legal authority to transfer temple property without religious department permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif Vanur

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif Vanur

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif Vanur

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Vanur

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    District Munsif Vanur

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  10. 04-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  11. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  12. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  13. 13-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  15. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  16. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  17. 06-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  18. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  19. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  20. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  21. 03-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  23. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  24. 23-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Vanur

  25. 13-Oct-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Vanur

  26. 23-Sep-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Vanur

  27. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  28. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif Vanur

  29. 11-Sep-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Vanur

  30. 28-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Vanur

  31. 19-Aug-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif Vanur

  32. 12-Aug-2025

    Counter

    District Munsif Vanur

  33. 08-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif Vanur

  34. 24-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    District Munsif Vanur

  35. 15-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Vanur

  36. 07-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    District Munsif Vanur

  37. 27-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Vanur

  38. 20-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif Vanur

  39. 13-Jun-2025

    Amendment

    District Munsif Vanur

  40. 03-Jun-2025

    IA Pending

    District Munsif Vanur

  41. 07-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 20-Mar-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 72/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S.No. 72/2019 Court Decision: The District Munsif Court, Vanur dismissed the plaintiff's suit with no decree. The court ruled that the plaintiff (Venkatasubbu) has no absolute right or title over the disputed agricultural property in Akasampattu village. The property was donated to three temples (Sri Veda Vinayagar, Pidari Selliyamman, and Sri Mari Sengalaneersamnman temples) by deed of settlement dated 14.11.1935, and the temples retain ownership. The plaintiff's 2000 sale deed from a previous owner (Venukapala Naidu) was invalid as that person lacked legal authority to transfer temple property without religious department permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case