Parvathi vs Kanimozhi — 56/2019

Case under --- Section 37(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNVP350001022025

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Number

102/2025

Filing Date

22-02-2019

Registration No

56/2019

Registration Date

22-02-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Vanur

Judge

2-District Munsif Vanur

Acts & Sections

--- Section 37(2)
Ia/2/2026 Classification : Others Section ParvathiKanimozhi
Ia/3/2026 Classification : Others Section ParvathiKanimozhi
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Adjournment Petition Section ParvathiKanimozhi

Petitioner(s)

Parvathi

Respondent(s)

Kanimozhi

Parthiban

Jayachandiran

Purushothaman

Gajalakshmi

Vasudevan

Rukmangathan

Anbarasi

Indiradevi

Alamelu

Vijayalakshmi

Indirakumaran

Hearing History

Judge: 2-District Munsif Vanur

23-03-2026

Evidence

11-03-2026

Evidence

06-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

07-07-2025
Deposition
19-09-2025
Deposition

This is a cross-examination record (examination-in-chief) from the District Munsif Court, Vanur in a property dispute case (O.S. No. 56/2019) dated 19.09.2025. The document records the detailed testimony of the defendant's witness regarding disputed agricultural land (tawa sathes) allegedly sold in 1983-1986, with the witness denying various claims made by the plaintiff about unauthorized sales and lack of proper consideration. The cross-examination was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness before the District Munsif. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a cross-examination record (examination-in-chief) from the District Munsif Court, Vanur in a property dispute case (O.S. No. 56/2019) dated 19.09.2025. The document records the detailed testimony of the defendant's witness regarding disputed agricultural land (tawa sathes) allegedly sold in 1983-1986, with the witness denying various claims made by the plaintiff about unauthorized sales and lack of proper consideration. The cross-examination was recorded and admitted as correct by the witness before the District Munsif. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Vanur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case