Ramadass vs Selvaraj — 14/2017

The District Munsif of Vanur ruled in favor of Ramadass, declaring that he possesses an easement right to access his property (Schedule A) through the defendants' property (Schedule B), which serves as the only available pathway. The court found that although the 2006 partition deed between the parties did not explicitly mention the pathway agreement, an advocate commissioner's inspection confirmed that Schedule A property could only be accessed via Schedule B, and the defendants failed to prove any alternative route existed. The court granted a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with Ramadass's use of Schedule B as a means of access. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.