Panchayudham vs Archuna Gounder — 1/2015
Case under --- Section 25(b)and25(d). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNVP350000282025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
28/2025
Filing Date
05-01-2015
Registration No
1/2015
Registration Date
06-01-2015
Court
District Munsif Court, Vanur
Judge
2-District Munsif Vanur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Panchayudham
Respondent(s)
Archuna Gounder
Hearing History
Judge: 2-District Munsif Vanur
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 03-06-2026 | Evidence |
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 1/2015: Panchayudham v. Archuna Gounder - Summary This is a property dispute case heard before the District Munsif Court, Vanur. The document records the cross-examination of defendants 2, 4, 5, and 6 (dated 03.06.2026), wherein the witness testified regarding disputed ancestral property. The defendant claims no knowledge of the original suit, denies involvement in property management, and contests the plaintiff's title to the disputed land. The case involves competing claims over inherited property and purchase deeds (Patta No. 7), with the defendant asserting the property belongs to the first defendant's successors, not the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 1/2015: Panchayudham v. Archuna Gounder - Summary This is a property dispute case heard before the District Munsif Court, Vanur. The document records the cross-examination of defendants 2, 4, 5, and 6 (dated 03.06.2026), wherein the witness testified regarding disputed ancestral property. The defendant claims no knowledge of the original suit, denies involvement in property management, and contests the plaintiff's title to the disputed land. The case involves competing claims over inherited property and purchase deeds (Patta No. 7), with the defendant asserting the property belongs to the first defendant's successors, not the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts