Arakandanallur P.S. vs Ananath Advocate - Mr.K.Ramesh — 758/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 352, 506(i) 4. Status: Questioning. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNVP340024082024

Questioning

Next Hearing

01st April 2026

Filing Number

2174/2024

Filing Date

08-10-2024

Registration No

758/2024

Registration Date

08-10-2024

Court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur

Judge

1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 352, 506(i) 4

Petitioner(s)

Arakandanallur P.S.

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ananath Advocate - Mr.K.Ramesh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate

24-03-2026

Questioning

06-03-2026

Evidence

04-03-2026

Trial

24-02-2026

Trial

11-11-2025

Service Pending-Summon

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

This document contains witness depositions (Judicial Form No. 53) in a criminal case (CC No. 758/2024) from the District Civil & Sessions Court in Thiruvannamalai. Three witnesses testified on 06.03.2026 regarding an incident from February 24, 2019, where the complainant was allegedly assaulted near their residence. All three witnesses (ages 28, 70, and 40) stated they could not identify the perpetrator due to darkness and crowd, though they acknowledged the incident occurred, and the parties have since reached settlement. The court recorded their testimonies under CrPC Section 54(1), with cross-examinations conducted by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document contains witness depositions (Judicial Form No. 53) in a criminal case (CC No. 758/2024) from the District Civil & Sessions Court in Thiruvannamalai. Three witnesses testified on 06.03.2026 regarding an incident from February 24, 2019, where the complainant was allegedly assaulted near their residence. All three witnesses (ages 28, 70, and 40) stated they could not identify the perpetrator due to darkness and crowd, though they acknowledged the incident occurred, and the parties have since reached settlement. The court recorded their testimonies under CrPC Section 54(1), with cross-examinations conducted by the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvennainallur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case